Page 1 of 1

Align "resource monitoring" and Resource Monitor graphs

Posted: 15 Jan 2025, 12:41
by CodeTheFuture
The TOS6 "Enable continuous system resource monitoring" combined with the System Info > Resource Monitor tool is absolutely fantastic! I love this tool. It's helpful for troubleshooting and trend analysis over time for more informed decisions related to your device.

There is one problem though. While I can set my data retention on "resource monitoring" 30+ days (for example id like 365 days), my graphs only allow me to select the last 30 days.

Can these two features be aligned so that both the logging and graphs allow long time frame (months to years) monitoring for the new release please. Thanks!

Re: Align "resource monitoring" and Resource Monitor graphs

Posted: 15 Jan 2025, 14:53
by TMlinda
CodeTheFuture wrote: 15 Jan 2025, 12:41
The retention time setting for "Enable continuous system resource monitoring" can only be filled in for a maximum of 30 days, and cannot be filled in for more than 30 days.

Re: Align "resource monitoring" and Resource Monitor graphs

Posted: 15 Jan 2025, 15:16
by CodeTheFuture
Thanks for confirming that @TMwuu . Can we please request from the product team that this time is allowed to be increased past 30 days? I like like to see the trend over a few months at least if possible. Ideally i think a years worth of data would cover almost all use cases (determining how many new hard disks you expect to need to purchase in the coming year).

Re: Align "resource monitoring" and Resource Monitor graphs

Posted: 15 Jan 2025, 17:22
by TMlinda
CodeTheFuture wrote: 15 Jan 2025, 15:16
Your suggestion has been transferred to the product team for evaluation. Thank you for your understanding and support.

Re: Align "resource monitoring" and Resource Monitor graphs

Posted: 14 May 2025, 07:41
by CodeTheFuture
Has this been reviewed for consideration yet?

Re: Align "resource monitoring" and Resource Monitor graphs

Posted: 14 May 2025, 13:54
by GevinKe
CodeTheFuture wrote: 14 May 2025, 07:41
Hello!

Following an internal evaluation by our product team, we've determined that while your request does have merit, its current priority level is relatively low. As a result, we plan to focus our resources on developing other features with higher value at this stage.

Thank you for your continued support of TerraMaster.