TerraMaster Forum

addx972 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2024, 09:11

Gremlin wrote: ↑21 Dec 2024, 02:00

F4-424

We are using same base model (424), so essentially it is not the TOS version that is the issue.
My setup as follows:



Maybe raise this as a specific issue in a separate thread and see if it can be sorted.

addx972 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2024, 09:11

Gremlin wrote: ↑21 Dec 2024, 02:00

F4-424

please check if your system time is correct.

TMroy wrote: ↑22 Dec 2024, 12:43

the time is well set, maybe a language bug, it's in french, and I remember a long time ago that there was a bug if the language was not in english...

Theoretically, the UI language should not affect the system's scheduled power on/off function. You can download a copy of the system log and send it to technical support for them to take a look.

I have added a 12TB to a TRAID pool already consisting of 2 x 8TB and i'm currently waiting impatiently for it to finish, when i noticed this




something doesn't add up

McCoder67 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2025, 20:41 I have added a 12TB to a TRAID pool already consisting of 2 x 8TB and i'm currently waiting impatiently for it to finish, when i noticed this




something doesn't add up

System load reflects the system's busyness by counting the number of tasks queued and waiting to be processed. The longer the task queue, the higher the load value. While system load is somewhat related to CPU and memory usage, it is not entirely dependent on these factors and can also be influenced by other elements such as I/O operations.

TMtina wrote: ↑10 Feb 2025, 22:23

McCoder67 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2025, 20:41 I have added a 12TB to a TRAID pool already consisting of 2 x 8TB and i'm currently waiting impatiently for it to finish, when i noticed this




something doesn't add up

System load reflects the system's busyness by counting the number of tasks queued and waiting to be processed. The longer the task queue, the higher the load value. While system load is somewhat related to CPU and memory usage, it is not entirely dependent on these factors and can also be influenced by other elements such as I/O operations.

yeah i get all that, but i realize now that i messed up when making the screenshot, i should have included the CPU load and i didn't, sorry

in the new one the CPU is loaded 33.97% and the process md0_raid5 has a "CPU usage" of 38.92% which doesn't make sense , unless all process load in the "Processes" view adds up to 100% with each process load being the percentage of the CPU load ( in the case of md0_raid5 it would then be 38.92% of the 33.94% CPU load