We sincerely appreciate the time you have taken to offer your suggestion.Gremlin wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026, 06:49 A quick search of this forum will reveal 50 topics devoted to UPS. Sorry, but I am not the only poster who has spoken to these issues and I don't see my function as curator of UPS issues.
For me one big issue (maybe, maybe not) is that @TM writes in the help sections to the effect that any devices (nas) using the TNAS UPS server function as clients must all be connected to the same UPS. NUT was never written that way; it was intended as a 'distributed network' servicing multiple server/client relationships. In this context it is likely (I don't know) @TM has implemented NUT i a non-standard manner. What I know is that it does not really work in (what I would say is) a logical manner relative to NUT manuals/tutorials. Nothing is really configurable since the internals of Linux itself have been "modified" as well as the configuration files of NUT itself and hidden behind obfuscating links and files.
We regret to advise you that, due to a range of considerations, we are unable to adopt your proposal at present. Should circumstances allow, we may revisit this idea at a more suitable time in the future.


