TerraMaster Hyper Cache

More about TOS 5 new features and improvements. Note: this forum is not for bug report! If you want to report bug, please go to the correct forum.
User avatar
Aakriti
Posts: 1
Joined: 13 Oct 2023, 19:02

Re: TerraMaster Hyper Cache

Post by Aakriti » 14 Oct 2023, 15:39

ElPabloMaximo wrote:
26 Sep 2023, 19:40
@TMRoy

I guess my expectation was that I would be able to create a hypercache out of a mirrored pair of NVME and carve that pool up amongst more than one volume as I can with other appliances. Not that I can ONLY use the mirrored set for ONLY one volume.
Hi friend
When hardware constraints limit flexibility in pooling and partitioning storage, it is upsetting. Being able to allocate resources as needed can completely alter the situation.

djacobson
Posts: 3
Joined: 23 Apr 2020, 06:08

Re: TerraMaster Hyper Cache

Post by djacobson » 08 Nov 2023, 02:16

I know it's 1 SSD per volume. But I just wanted to verify that if I have a 2TB SSD and install it, the largest cache I can create on it is 757GB. (I think.) The rest of the 1.3-1.4TB left is wasted, correct? Better to use a 1TB SSD, yes?

Thanks

User avatar
TMzethar
TerraMaster Team
Posts: 828
Joined: 27 Oct 2020, 16:43

Re: TerraMaster Hyper Cache

Post by TMzethar » 08 Nov 2023, 19:41

Your idea is reasonable, as the remaining 1.3-1.4T cannot be used currently after you have create a 757GB cache.
To contact our team, please send email to following addresses, remember to replace (at) with @:
Technical team: support(at)terra-master.com (for technical support)
Service team: service(at)terra-master.com (for purchasing, return, replacement, RMA service)

User avatar
Gremlin
Posts: 252
Joined: 02 Dec 2022, 22:31

Re: TerraMaster Hyper Cache

Post by Gremlin » 08 Nov 2023, 19:58

Never been quite clear on this, but does the selected cache size determine the amount of system memory consumed by cache? (I don't have a need for cache in my system.) If so, then maybe 500Gb ssd might be more cost effective and set whole of it for cache. (Or a large % to leave some headroom if desired).
F5-221 5.1.95 (Since 18/11/23), 8GB System Partition on 3 x 4TB IronWolf in Traid,
F2-221 TOS6 (Beta), 8GB System Partition on 2 x 6TB in Traid.

User avatar
Darsh
Posts: 4
Joined: 09 Nov 2023, 21:25

Re: TerraMaster Hyper Cache

Post by Darsh » 12 Nov 2023, 21:16

ElPabloMaximo wrote:
24 Sep 2023, 10:43
More than one Hyper Cache be created in the system. It seems that only one Hyper Cache can be created and it can be assigned to only one volume which is very limiting. IMO, creating only one volume in a system is always a bad idea.
Agreed! The development of only one Hyper Cache per system and its confinement to a single volume presents issues for system optimization. The option to construct numerous Hyper Caches across different volumes would provide greater flexibility and better cater to a wider range of storage requirements.

User avatar
Darsh
Posts: 4
Joined: 09 Nov 2023, 21:25

Re: TerraMaster Hyper Cache

Post by Darsh » 18 Nov 2023, 23:00

ElPabloMaximo wrote:
24 Sep 2023, 10:43
More than one Hyper Cache be created in the system. It seems that only one Hyper Cache can be created and it can be assigned to only one volume which is very limiting. IMO, creating only one volume in a system is always a bad idea.
Agreed, the limitation of creating only one Hyper Cache and assigning it to a single volume can be restrictive. Diversifying volumes in a system is often essential for effective management. Advocating for the flexibility to create multiple Hyper Caches could significantly enhance system customization and optimization.Gb whatsapp Download

User avatar
Gremlin
Posts: 252
Joined: 02 Dec 2022, 22:31

Re: TerraMaster Hyper Cache

Post by Gremlin » 19 Nov 2023, 00:19

{L_BUTTON_AT}Darsh

Now you are plagiarizing yourself! Silly.
F5-221 5.1.95 (Since 18/11/23), 8GB System Partition on 3 x 4TB IronWolf in Traid,
F2-221 TOS6 (Beta), 8GB System Partition on 2 x 6TB in Traid.

Post Reply