viewtopic.php?f=26&t=310&start=10
It appears that the F5-221 reports incorrect memory information in the DMI table using the dmidecode command, compared to the F2-221 which seems to show the right information.
Code: Select all
# dmidecode -t memory
# dmidecode 3.1
Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs.
SMBIOS 3.0.0 present.
Handle 0x002D, DMI type 16, 23 bytes
Physical Memory Array
Location: System Board Or Motherboard
Use: System Memory
Error Correction Type: None
Maximum Capacity: 16 GB
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Number Of Devices: 2
Handle 0x002E, DMI type 17, 40 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x002D
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: 64 bits
Data Width: 64 bits
Size: 2048 MB
Form Factor: SODIMM
Set: None
Locator: ChannelA-DIMM0
Bank Locator: BANK 0
Type: DDR3
Type Detail: Synchronous
Speed: 1600 MT/s
Manufacturer: 0000
Serial Number: 00000000
Asset Tag: 9876543210
Part Number: . .. . ..
Rank: Unknown
Configured Clock Speed: 1600 MT/s
Minimum Voltage: 1.5 V
Maximum Voltage: 1.5 V
Configured Voltage: 1.5 V
I find it strange that the F2-221 reports the information correctly in the DMI table when the two units are likely very similar at the BIOS/motherboard level. Is there an updated BIOS or other means for the F5-221 to resolve this?