Search found 18 matches
- 24 Apr 2020, 03:42
- Forum: File Services
- Topic: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15658
Re: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
Hi, sorry for the late reply. It is Open Media Vault (version 5), based on Debian. There are currently only two issues I have with running this version and they are: [1] The fan control does not work, the fans run at their lowest speed, and [2] The LED's on the NAS are not correct, ie all drive led ...
- 15 Apr 2020, 00:34
- Forum: Compatibility
- Topic: F5-421 8GB RAM Module Upgrade
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5520
Re: F5-421 8GB RAM Module Upgrade
I can confirm that the Crucial CT102464BF160B 8GB memory module works in my F5-421.
My NAS now see's 12GB memory and is much happier, YMMV
My NAS now see's 12GB memory and is much happier, YMMV
- 14 Apr 2020, 14:58
- Forum: File Services
- Topic: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15658
Re: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
Just an update: Testing with different software installed yielded better results. On the different software: [1] I did not have any of the issues listed in this thread. [2] Transfer speeds were way faster (roughly 28 hours to transfer 5.8TB, on TOS it took 3 days) I think I will stay on the other so...
- 10 Apr 2020, 00:37
- Forum: File Services
- Topic: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15658
Re: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
The hardware appears to be okay, I think it may just be a setting in the TOS environment somewhere. I'm currently testing with a different OS installed, and so far I've not had any speed drops or any memory allocation errors, but I need to transfer around 5.8TB of data first so that I am doing exact...
- 09 Apr 2020, 17:21
- Forum: System Configuration
- Topic: "/etc/sysctl.conf" not run at boot
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3633
Re: "/etc/sysctl.conf" not run at boot
This will fail:
it should be:
Code: Select all
echo fs.inotify.max_user_watches = 32768
Code: Select all
fs.inotify.max_user_watches = 32768
- 09 Apr 2020, 04:40
- Forum: File Services
- Topic: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15658
Re: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
There is certainly something up, I can reproduce this with no application installed, that means, no docker installed, no syncthing container active. However, here is an idle array, I was testing the raid replacement, and while the array is rebuilding I get the same allocation errors as previously li...
- 07 Apr 2020, 21:22
- Forum: File Services
- Topic: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15658
Re: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
Okay, thanks.
I just noticed that I mad a typo in the RAID-6 configuration, what I meant to say was:
The NAS has 5 x Seagate Barracuda ST4000LM024 SATA HDD's configured in a RAID-6 pool.
I just noticed that I mad a typo in the RAID-6 configuration, what I meant to say was:
The NAS has 5 x Seagate Barracuda ST4000LM024 SATA HDD's configured in a RAID-6 pool.
- 07 Apr 2020, 19:07
- Forum: File Services
- Topic: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15658
Re: swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x1080020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
Email sent. I can reproduce this with transferring large files to the NAS without any other applications running. The nas has a 6 x RAID-6 pool setup with 1 volume running a btrfs file system. The nas also has it's 4 x 1Gbps interfaces configured in a static lag group. I connect to the NAS using FTP...
- 07 Apr 2020, 16:32
- Forum: Compatibility
- Topic: F5-421 8GB RAM Module Upgrade
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5520
Re: F5-421 8GB RAM Module Upgrade
Where can I order the 8GB memory module from? I had a look at your store page here, and it doesnt appear that you have the 8GB modules available there.
Also came across the PHS 8GB SODIMM which claims to be 100% compatible with TerraMaster.
Also came across the PHS 8GB SODIMM which claims to be 100% compatible with TerraMaster.
- 06 Apr 2020, 23:29
- Forum: Compatibility
- Topic: F5-421 8GB RAM Module Upgrade
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5520
F5-421 8GB RAM Module Upgrade
Hi, I have the TM F5-421 nas device, it comes with 4GB of memory, however, I believe we are able to upgrade the nas to 12GB by adding in an extra 8GB memory module. I checked your amazon store and it appears that you only have the 4GB RAM module available there. According to the F5-421 compatibility...